Wednesday, April 29, 2026
Home Blog

FIFA rare exception allows Afghan women’s refugee team to compete as official national team without Taliban approval International Sports News

0

FIFA makes rare exception to allow Afghan women's refugee team to compete as official national team without Taliban approval
Members of the Afghan women’s football team celebrate after scoring against Chad in their first international match since fleeing their home country, Sunday, October 26, 2025, in Casablanca, Morocco. (AP Photo/Mosa’ab Elshamy)

Afghanistan’s women’s national team, forced into exile after the Taliban returned to power in 2021, have been given a formal path back to international competition after the FIFA Council approved a major rule change. At a meeting in Vancouver, the FIFA Council agreed to change its rules to recognize a refugee team operating as the Afghan Women’s United and allow it to participate in official international competitions without the approval of the Taliban-controlled Afghan Football Association. The decision marks the first time that exiled players have been allowed to represent Afghanistan in FIFA-sanctioned competitions, although Afghan authorities continue to ban women’s sports.

National team displaced by political changes

The modern Afghan women’s national team was originally established in 2007 with the participation of former captain and activist Khalida Popal and the support of the Afghan National Olympic Committee. The team has been operating within the international football system for more than a decade, with its last official match being in 2018. This structure collapsed in 2021 when the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan and imposed sweeping restrictions on women and girls, including a ban on participation in sports. The women’s national team was effectively disbanded and many players fled the country fearing persecution. In the following months, FIFA assisted in the evacuation of more than 160 at-risk athletes, officials and human rights advocates related to football and basketball, dispersing players to Australia, Europe, the United States and parts of the Middle East.

Years of lobbying leads to regulatory shift

Players, activists and rights groups have been pressing FIFA for more than three years to formally recognize the exiled team, arguing that athletes should not lose their international careers because of restrictions imposed by a regime they no longer live with. This pressure led to the formation in 2021 of Afghanistan Women’s United, a team made up of refugee players.The initiative forms part of FIFA’s wider strategy to support women’s football in Afghanistan, combining diplomatic engagement, financial support and organized competition opportunities. The rule change builds on the FIFA Women’s Action Strategy for Afghanistan approved by the FIFA Council last May and follows the establishment of the Afghanistan Women’s Football Federation. The Afghan Women’s Football Federation is a FIFA-backed team that provides structured competition opportunities for Afghan women’s football players living abroad. The first step towards recognition came in October 2025, when the team participated in a tournament in Morocco along with Chad, Libya and Tunisia. The tournament itself has been moved from the United Arab Emirates as visa issues prevent teams from traveling, highlighting the logistical challenges players continue to face.

afghan women refugee team

Members of Afghanistan’s women’s team pose for a photo before their match against Chad in Casablanca, Morocco, on Sunday, October 26, 2025, their first international match since fleeing their home country. (AP Photo/Mosa’ab Elshamy)

FIFA also organized selection camps in England and Australia as part of the ongoing effort to build a competitive squad, and provided individual support packages to nearly 90 players. The wider talent pool includes more than 80 footballers in exile across multiple continents.

What the rule change actually allows

Until now, FIFA stipulated that any national team must be officially recognized by its domestic football association. In the case of Afghanistan, that meant gaining approval from the football federation, which operates under Taliban authority and does not recognize women’s football. The rule change removes this requirement in certain circumstances, allowing refugee teams to compete independently if the national association is unable or unwilling to register a women’s team.

afghan women refugee team

Members of the Afghanistan women’s team gather for a team talk during training ahead of their first international match since fleeing their home country, Saturday, Oct. 25, 2025, in Casablanca, Morocco. (AP Photo/Mosa’ab Elshamy)

As a result, the Afghan women’s football team can now participate in official competitions as the Afghan representative team without seeking approval from the country’s governing body. FIFA President Gianni Infantino said in a statement: “We are proud of the wonderful journey that the Afghan women’s football team has embarked on and through this initiative we aim to allow them, as well as other FIFA member associations who may not be able to register for a national team or represent a team in a FIFA competition, to take the next step in coordination with the relevant federations.

FIFA president Infantino calls on protesters to remain calm at Israeli football matches amid peace talks

FIFA President Gianni Infantino speaks during the 32nd UEFA European Football Club Congress on Thursday, October 9, 2025 in Rome, Italy. (Fabrizio Corradetti/LaPresse via AP)

What’s next for the team?

The timing of the decision means the team will not qualify for the 2027 Women’s World Cup in Brazil as the process is already underway. However, this opens the door to qualifying for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. In the short term, Afghanistan’s women’s football team are expected to return to action during the June international window, but plans for exhibition matches against their opponents have yet to be confirmed. The squad is currently being finalized through an ongoing selection phase, drawn from players who continue to train and compete in various countries without a formal national structure.

A wider meaning beyond football

The decision reflects a shift in the way FIFA handles national representation in exceptional circumstances. By allowing a team to compete without sanction from its home federation, the organization is effectively acknowledging the political realities that may prevent athletes from competing through traditional structures. For the players themselves, the ruling is the result of years of continued advocacy and persistence. It restores pathways into international football that have been closed since 2021 and do not require compromise with a system that excludes them. More broadly, it sets a precedent for how governing bodies respond when athletes are displaced by conflict or political change, ensuring that participation at the international level is not entirely dependent on individual country circumstances. For the Afghan Women’s Federation, it means something more immediate, a chance to represent their country again, even outside its borders.

‘Incorrect football’: Fans slam Piers Morgan after PSG’s nine-goal thriller against Bayern

0

'Incorrect football': Fans slam Piers Morgan after PSG's nine-goal thriller against Bayern
Champions League semi-finals Paris Saint-Germain vs Bayern Munich/Photo: Bayern Munich

There are also some nights Champions League When the sport feels too fast to handle, when one goal barely has time to settle before another arrives, the first leg between Paris Saint-Germain and Bayern Munich fell squarely into that category, with a 5-4 victory at the Parc des Princes thrilling most of the crowd but at least one prominent figure in total disbelief.

A night that never settles down

The score itself told part of the story, although it didn’t quite capture how quickly the game turned from one end to the other. Harry Kane opened the scoring from the penalty spot 17 minutes later, a routine goal that seemed to set Bayern on its path, but the game began to become more unpredictable. Hvitsa Kvaratschlija equalized for PSG seven minutes later and from that point on, the rhythm of the night completely changed, becoming a series of attacking outbursts rather than a controlled game.PSG scored three more goals before half-time through Joao Neves, Michael Olise and Ousmane Dembélé, while Vincent Kompany’s Bayern responded through Dayo Upamecano and Luis Diaz to make it 3-2 at the break. There was no slowing down in the second half; goals each from Kvaradzhelia and Dembélé extended PSG’s lead to 5-2, but Bayern equalized again thanks to late goals from Upamecano and Diaz, leaving the scoreline delicately even in the second leg at the Allianz Arena.

why most people like it

For many viewers, the appeal is obvious. The game moved relentlessly from one end to the other, opportunities came together rather than in isolation, and the usual caution at this stage of the game simply didn’t cut it.The offensive performance earned widespread praise from experts. Speaking to CBS, former Arsenal striker Thierry Henry captured the balance between analysis and enjoyment, saying: “That game was not boring. Again, if you put on your pro hat, we’re going to have to analyze some aspects of the goal conceded. But you know what? I’m happy and I think everyone in the family is happy. ” Former Manchester United goalkeeper Peter Schmeichel was more emphatic, adding: “I can’t remember seeing a better game in my life. The pace and the change of the game from one end to the other, it was just fantastic.” Former Liverpool defender Jamie Carragher focused on the quality of the team’s attack, noting: “Every attacking player on the pitch is an eight or nine out of 10. And I think every attacking player is better than the opponent.”

Piers Morgan’s different take on the same game

Morgan looked at the same nine goals and came to the opposite conclusion. Posting on X, he wrote: “This is not correct football. Too aggressive. Leakier than a sieve. Arteta’s expendable Arsenal will crush any of them.” It’s a deliberately pointed point, but it’s based on a specific view of what high-level football should be prioritized. He called the game “leaker than a sieve,” referring to the defensive errors that led to so many goals, suggesting both teams sacrificed structure for spectacle that would have been punished by the more disciplined side. References to “Arteta’s expendable arsenal” bring this idea into focus. Under manager Mikel Arteta, Arsenal have favored a control-based style that focuses on managing space, maintaining possession, maintaining a compact defensive shape and gradually wearing down opponents rather than engaging in open communication. This style of play typically produces tighter scores and less drama, but is designed to minimize risk, especially in knockout football.

Fans and experts fight back

|That view did not land quietly. Reactions were swift online, with many arguing that Morgan’s actions were inconsistent with what most people had just seen.Fans were quick to express their opinions on the reporter’s take, with reactions ranging from dismay to outright disagreement.One fan said: “This is why Arsenal fans are universally hated – they are the only ones who complain about goals.”Another added: “Dude lives in a world of constant delusion. Tonight’s game will be a snoozefest. “A third comment read: “Pearce called Arsenal attrition, which is rich. Arteta’s side were still in second gear at half-time and praying for Saka to save them.”Others reject criticism of high-scoring football entirely. Someone said: “I disagree. This is one of the best games in the history of the Champions League. I would rather watch a 5-4 game, or even a 3-3 game, than a 1-0 game with Arsenal, where they parked the bus the whole game.”

Real-time comparison

The controversy comes as Arsenal prepare for their semi-final against Atletico Madrid, coached by Diego Simeone, whose teams are often defined by the qualities Morgan champions: discipline, compactness and control of chaos. The game at the Metropolitan Stadium is widely expected to be more cautious than PSG’s clash with Bayern, with fewer chances, less margins and a greater focus on tactical structure. Arsenal, who are chasing their first Champions League final since 2006, are heading into a game that will test whether that control can carry them through.

Why New York City’s AI startup offices are flashy but mostly empty

0

Blake Anderson found the perfect New York office for his artificial intelligence mobile app development company, 10x.

Yasmine Naini is currently the only employee at the Fazeshift Park Avenue coworking space.
Yasmine Naini is currently the only employee at the Fazeshift Park Avenue coworking space.

Airy SoHo loft features high ceilings and hardwood floors. It’s located in the heart of Manhattan’s startup district, not far from OpenAI’s outpost. Anderson pays $28,500 a month for the 3,000-square-foot space, which has 30 tables and a video game lounge area.

All that’s missing is staff.

The 25-year-old founder only owned one home when he signed a one-year lease in December. He remembers walking into the office and being surrounded by empty desks. “It was like: Man, have we swung too high?” Anderson said.

Cash-rich AI startups Promote a new round of prosperity Commercial real estate market in Manhattan. AI companies will sign more than 845,000 square feet of leases by 2025, according to real estate services firm JLL. This year, their leasing rates have nearly doubled, acquiring more than 414,000 square feet in the first quarter.

But on any given day, many offices have more vacant desks than employees. Benjamin Bass, vice chairman of JLL’s New York brokerage business, said he has recently started seeing AI companies leasing 60% more space than they currently need for the number of employees they need.

As AI companies see it, they will have ample time and opportunity to recruit employees. The more pressing issue is getting the coolest high-end office space in downtown Manhattan’s most coveted neighborhoods, from SoHo to the Flatiron District and NoMad.

Some companies say they want room for growth as they execute aggressive hiring plans. Others say office space in New York provides them with crucial credibility with clients, even if they currently only have a few local employees.

“One client actually asked us if we were personally involved in their due diligence process,” said Caitlin Leksana, CEO and co-founder of Fazeshift, a startup that provides AI agents for accounts receivable.

Yasmine Naini, director of investor relations and partnerships, is currently the only employee at an 11-desk coworking space on Park Avenue that the company pays $7,022.95 a month.

For some, it’s the atmosphere that matters more. Startup employees are spending more time than ever in the office for the following reasons The rise of “9-9-6” culture (working 9am to 9pm, six days a week) and wanted to work in a beautiful (if sparsely populated) space.

“If signing up for a larger workplace improves my ability to think clearly and the quality of my work experience by 20 percent, then it’s well worth it,” Anderson said.

Since locking in the lease, 10x’s New York staff has grown to four. That still leaves enough room to invite a handful of friends to use the SoHo office for free if they wish.

On a recent Monday, there were three 10x employees in the office, along with three friends and dozens of unused desks. But the extra space proved to be a blessing, Anderson said, because he found it calming. “Especially in a city like New York, it’s hard to find a quiet place,” he said.

With demand for properties in downtown Manhattan so high, landlords still have enough power to push for standard lease terms of seven to 10 years. Bass said AI startups have to make bets based on what they might need in a few years.

After using coworking desks and borrowing space in other startup offices, John Zhao was ready to commit to his own space. The founder and CEO of AI health startup Blossom is tired of moving around.

He signed a two-year lease on the 5,000-square-foot headquarters in Flatiron for about $17,000 a month. He has 12 employees covering about 40 desks, but he expects to expand into that area next year.

The space is littered with cardboard boxes and a tangle of computer cables. But it still comes with the essentials: a new ping pong table, a few industrial-sized boxes of Skinny Pop, and a well-stocked wine rack above the refrigerator.

During the dot-com bubble burst in the early 2000s, office landlords suffered when hundreds of startups folded and stopped paying rent.

JLL’s Bass said that hasn’t stopped many New York landlords from betting that these AI startups will grow in terms of headcount and revenue.

Even so, they often take a close look at balance sheets, financing, run rates, business plans and revenue projections before deciding whether to rent out a property — almost as if they were deciding whether to invest in a company, he said.

Some early industry players who were aggressive in leasing quickly outgrew their space, which helped solve the problem.

Artificial intelligence health startup Adonis leased a 25,000-square-foot office at 3 World Trade Center with just 25 employees. Today, the company has 85 employees, 50-60 of whom work in the office every day.

“We basically gave the company a size 12 shoe, and we were a size 4,” co-founder and CEO Akash Magoon said of the early decision. “We thought it would be an incentive.”

Write to Isabelle Busquet: isabelle.bousquette@wsj.com

Assembly election 2026 exit polls: How accurate were the last predictions for West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and more

0

NEW DELHI: With polls drawing to a close in Assam, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal and the Union Territory of Puducherry, focus is quietly turning towards the much-awaited exit polls. Exit polls, or opinion polls, are typically released half an hour after polls close and provide an early look at how people are likely to vote.Exit polls often determine who will win, but they are not always accurate. In past elections, some were right about the overall trend, while others were far from the final result.

watch

Bengal second phase polls rocked by clashes, EVM controversy, Lathi allegations, political standoff

The final round of assembly elections in the five states of Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Assam, Puducherry and West Bengal provides a useful benchmark.Here are the results predicted last time by the exit polls for the assembly polls in Assam, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal:

kerala

Exit polls in Kerala correctly predicted a victory for the Left Democratic Front (LDF) but underestimated its dominance. The poll average shows the LDF winning around 82 seats, while the United Democratic Front (UDF) is expected to win around 56 seats. However, the final results showed that the LDP did much better, gaining 99 seats, 17 more than predicted. On the other hand, UDF got only 41 seats which was less than 15 seats.

tamil nadu

In Tamil Nadu, exit polls roughly accurately predicted a win for the DMK-led alliance, although they slightly overestimated its size. On average DMK+ was predicted to have about 166 seats while the actual number was 159 seats. The AIADMK+ alliance was expected to win around 63 seats, but performed better than expected, winning 75 seats, 12 more than expected. While the predictions of the overall verdict were correct, the exit polls did not fully reflect the resilience of the AIADMK-led group.

assam

Assam emerged as one of the most accurately predicted elections. Exit polls expected the BJP-led NDA to win about 71 seats, while the Congress-led alliance was expected to win about 54 seats.The end result is very close to these estimates. The NDA won 75 seats, just 4 more than expected, while the opposition alliance won 50 seats, only slightly less than expected.

pondicherry

In Puducherry, the exit polls correctly predicted the NDA’s victory but overestimated its seat count. The average NDA was predicted to have about 21 seats, while the actual number was 16.UPA’s performance was more in line with expectations, winning 9 seats as expected. The biggest gap, however, comes from independents.

west bengal

West Bengal was the biggest anomaly, with exit polls failing to predict the scale and clarity of the task. Average polls suggest it is a closely contested race, with the Trinamool Congress (TMC) expected to win about 155 seats and the BJP-led NDA 126 seats. In fact, the TMC secured a landslide victory of 216 seats, 61 more than expected, while the NDA bagged only 77 seats, 49 less than expected. The Congress-led alliance was expected to win around 12 seats but ended up with just one.

polling

Do you think the exit polls accurately reflected the election results?

Overall, exit poll accuracy across the five states was mixed. While states like Assam and Tamil Nadu are fairly accurate in terms of overall direction, there is a gap between Kerala and Puducherry in terms of estimated profits and seat share. West Bengal has clearly failed in its duty.

Epstein’s silence, subtle messages and NATO push: Highlights from King Charles III’s historic US speech

0

King Charles III visited the United States to celebrate the 250th anniversary of American independence. This is the king’s first visit to the United States as monarch and the first state visit by a British sovereign since 2007.However, the visit also had important diplomatic implications at a time when Anglo-American relations were strained by Britain’s reluctance to fully support a joint U.S.-Israeli war against Iran.British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has stressed that Britain will not get involved in the Iran conflict unless it is in the national interest, stressing that lessons from the Iraq war will continue to influence his approach.Against this backdrop, King Charles delivered a historic joint address to the US Congress, the first by a British monarch since Queen Elizabeth II in 1991.Here are the key points:

A candid start: “We don’t always agree”

The king began his speech by acknowledging “a period of great uncertainty” and cited conflicts in the Middle East and Europe as well as rising political tensions. In one notable line, he said, “We don’t always see eye to eye,” a candid acknowledgment of recent disagreements between the two allies.However, on a positive note, he said the results the US and UK could achieve would benefit not only their own citizens but the wider world.

Checks and Balances: A subtle message?

In citing Magna Carta, King Charles stressed that executive power must be subject to checks and balances – a fundamental principle shared by both countries.The words drew loud applause, especially from Democrats, and were widely interpreted as a subtle reminder amid ongoing debate over presidential power under Donald Trump.

NATO and Ukraine: strengthening the alliance

The king stressed the importance of the transatlantic alliance, quoting former US diplomat and security adviser Henry Kissinger. He reminded lawmakers that NATO had invoked Article 5 only once to defend the United States after the 9/11 attacks.He also called for continued unwavering support for Ukraine as part of a shared commitment to global security.

climate change emerges

King Charles, a long-time environmental advocate, referenced the “catastrophic melting of ice caps,” inserting climate concerns into broader discussions about global security and cooperation.The mention is a subtle contrast to rhetoric in the United States supporting the expansion of fossil fuel production.

Epstein’s omissions striking

One notable aspect of the speech was that there was no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his victims, despite ongoing scrutiny and recent revelations involving high-profile individuals.The closest King came to was a general statement about supporting victims of social ills — a statement that some critics said was insufficient.

Humor relieves tension

Despite its heavy subject matter, the King’s Speech was full of humor. He quoted Oscar Wilde, saying the United States and Britain had everything in common “except language, of course,” and joked that he had not come to the United States to stage a “cunning rearguard action” to restore British rule.Moments of levity seem to help lighten the mood in an otherwise potentially tense atmosphere.

White House Jokes: Jokes and Ridicule at State Dinners

In addition to speaking before the U.S. Congress, the two heads of state also shared light moments at a White House state dinner.King Charles III gave US President Donald Trump a taste of his own medicine when he joked that without the British, Americans might speak French. Referring to Trump’s past remarks about Europe, the king joked: “If it weren’t for us, you’d be speaking French.”Trump made light-hearted comments about the British royal family, recalling how his mother admired the young king. “My mother was obsessed with Charles,” he said, eliciting laughter in the conversation.

“AI chip in bat”? Vaibhav Sooryavanshi breaks silence with cheeky reply – Watch

0

“AI chip in bat”? Vaibhav Sooryavanshi breaks silence with cheeky reply – Watch
Vaibhav Sooryavanshi (Image: IPL)

New Delhi: rajasthan royalsTeen star Vaibhav Sooryavanshi has finally broken his silence on the bizarre ‘AI chip in bat’ accusations, and he’s done so in style with a cheeky response that’s now taken the internet by storm.After another record-breaking run in IPL 2026, the 15-year-old prodigy was asked if there is indeed some artificial help hidden in his willow. Sooryavanshi smiled and replied, “This is what God gave me. You told me you are making use of it.” [God has implanted it and told me he is putting something in my bat. I am just using that.”

Watch

Kumar Sangakkara on RR’s win over Punjab Kings

The light-hearted remark, shared by Rajasthan Royals on social media, quickly went viral — much like everything the youngster seems to touch this season.WATCH: Sooryavanshi answers AI chip questionAI claim sparks buzz after stunning centuryThe unusual “AI chip” theory first surfaced after Sooryavanshi’s jaw-dropping 103 off just 37 balls against Sunrisers Hyderabad. Pakistan-based analyst Nauman Niaz jokingly suggested the teen’s bat be tested.“Think about it… get his bat checked… he probably used an AI chip… he is unreal,” Niaz said, while also marvelling at the youngster’s technique and 360-degree strokeplay.Fastest-ever to 400: Record books rewrittenIf there were doubts, Sooryavanshi has answered them the only way he knows — with the bat. During RR’s clash against Punjab Kings, he became the fastest player in IPL history to reach 400 runs in a season, getting there in just 167 balls.He broke the long-standing mark held by Andre Russell (188 balls in 2019), leaving elite names like Abhishek SharmaNicholas Pooran and Glenn Maxwell were behind.The milestone was achieved during a stunning 43 off 16 balls, an innings that featured fearless batting that dismissed Arshdeep Singh and Rocky Ferguson.Sooryavanshi is now on top of the run-run charts (IPL 2026 Orange Cap) having hit 4 hundreds in 9 games and scored a staggering 238.09 runs with 37 sixes.

Fox host Jimmy Failla blasted with hot mic by WHCD security before filming: ‘Two random chicks’

0

fox news Host Jimmy Failla, who was caught with a hot microphone, criticized the lack of security measures over the unfortunate incident. White House Press Dinner – claims “two random chicks” are responsible for letting people in.

Fox News' Jimmy Failla criticized the event's security measures, saying they were inadequate for such a high-profile gathering. (Jimmy Farrar/X)
Fox News’ Jimmy Failla criticized the event’s security measures, saying they were inadequate for such a high-profile gathering. (Jimmy Farrar/X)

The witty conservative comedian was heard assessing the inadequate safety protocols while interviewing guests on the red carpet Saturday night.

“It looked like they were two random chicks holding the front door open,” the “Fox News Saturday Night” host complained, unaware that he was on air.

“They don’t even try anymore. I’m just saying they don’t even like agent People, like the girls who work here are holding the door. Even those guys don’t make it any better.

“They might as well have put a doorstop. They put a doorstop and a scarecrow: Don’t joke with this guy,” he added.

Also read: Kash Patel grilled on security lapses in White House dinner shooting: Did he avoid a key question? ‘It was a complete failure’

WHCD shooting suspect Cole Thomas Allen

Failla’s security check took place about an hour before the chaos, when the accused gunman, Cole Thomas AllenThe 31-year-old managed to bypass a security checkpoint inside the hotel and opened fire.

Officials said the suspect was trying to kill President Trump and senior officials in his administration, but he was quickly subdued by Secret Service agents.

Cole Thomas Allen appears in court and the charges against him

Cole Tomas Allen, 31, of Torrance, californiawas formally charged with attempting to assassinate Trump following a shooting during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

The event, held at the Washington Hilton Hotel, was interrupted when Allen reportedly tried to break into the venue armed with a gun and a knife, prompting the president, first lady and senior administration officials to quickly evacuate.

Allen appeared in court on April 27, 2026, to answer multiple charges, including attempted assassination and firearms-related offenses.

NBA is about to make major rule changes to crack down on teams deliberately losing games to get better draft picks International Sports News

0

NBA prepares to make major rule changes to crack down on teams deliberately losing games to get better draft picks
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver speaks during a news conference during the NBA Basketball All-Star Weekend in Inglewood, Calif., Saturday, Feb. 14, 2026 (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

this NBA is heading towards one of the most significant rule changes in years, not on the field but in how teams build their future. At its core is a long-standing problem with “tanking,” and a proposed solution called the “3-2-1 Draw” that would change the way young talent enters the league. According to ESPN reporter Shams Charania, the league has formally submitted this proposal to the general managers of all 30 teams, and it is expected to be voted on by the Board of Governors on May 28. The framework has been discussed at a number of meetings with bosses, executives and competition committees, and while minor tweaks are still possible, its core ideas have gained widespread support. To understand why the league is considering such a shift, start with the system in place today and why it creates unexpected incentives.

What “tanking” means and why it’s a problem

Simply put, tanking is when a team deliberately weakens its chances of winning a game, usually late in the season, to ensure a better draft pick next season. The draft is an annual system by which the league allocates new players (usually from college or international leagues) to NBA teams. The worst team in the regular season is given the best opportunity to draft first, which is important because the No. 1 pick usually brings in franchise-changing players. To prevent a team from just finishing last and automatically getting the No. 1 pick, the NBA uses a lottery system. This is a weighted draw that determines the order of the best picks, with worse teams getting better odds. Even with this system in place, the incentives are still clear. If finishing last improves your chances of landing a top prospect, then losing games, especially late in the season, may become strategically valuable. That’s what the league is now trying to prevent. NBA commissioner Adam Silver addressed the issue directly earlier this year, saying the current structure forces teams to “do whatever it takes to maximize their chances of being drafted” and confirming reform is a priority. Two teams were fined in February for the league prioritizing draft position over winning, with the Indiana Pacers fined $100,000 and the Utah Jazz fined $500,000.

How the current draft lottery works

Under the current system, the 14 teams that missed the playoffs will enter the draft lottery. The team with the worst record has the highest probability of receiving the No. 1 pick, although that odds are somewhat flattened compared to earlier versions of the system. The aim behind earlier reforms introduced in 2019 was already to reduce the deficit by giving the three worst teams similar odds. But even with such an adjustment, there is still an advantage at or near the bottom. This is the dynamic that the new proposals seek to reverse.

What the “3-2-1 Lottery” Proposal Changes

The proposed system introduces several interrelated changes, all of which revolve around the same idea: being the worst team in the league should no longer be the most valuable position. First, the draw will be expanded from 14 teams to 16 teams. This means more teams are still vying for the top draft spot, broadening the field of competition. Second, and more importantly, the distribution of lottery odds will be reshaped. The model is called “3-2-1” because it allocates a different number of draws based on a team’s standing, often described as the “balls” in the draw. Teams ranked just above the bottom, especially those with the fourth to tenth worst record in the league, will gain the strongest advantage. These teams will receive three lottery picks each, effectively making them the favorites to land the No. 1 pick. In contrast, the three teams with the worst records would enter what the proposal describes as the “relegation zone.” These teams will only receive two lottery picks each, meaning their odds will actually be worse than teams that perform slightly better during the season. The message is simple. Rather than incentivizing teams to lose as many games as possible, the system rewards teams that remain competitive enough to avoid the absolute bottom of the table.

How the rest of the system will be built

The proposed “3-2-1” NBA draft reform aims to reduce intentional losing or “tanking” by reshaping how draft positions are awarded and how end-of-season rankings are handled. According to the plan, all 16 teams that missed the playoffs will enter the draft lottery area, instead of only the worst-performing teams having the strongest chances.To reflect how close a team is to making the playoffs, the system ties draft lottery chances to regular season completion and NBA play-in game performance. The play-in tournament amounts to a mini-playoff for the teams ranked 7th to 10th in each league, with teams ranked 1st to 6th automatically qualifying for the playoffs.In the play-in tournament, teams compete for the final two playoff spots in each division. The seventh- and eighth-place teams play first, with the winner receiving the seventh seed and an immediate playoff spot. The loser is not eliminated immediately but gets a second chance by playing the winner of games 9 and 10. The winner of the last game will get the eighth and final playoff spot, while the loser will be eliminated from the playoffs entirely.Under the proposed changes, draft lottery odds are also used to reflect a team’s competitiveness throughout the season and how close they are to the playoffs. The teams that finish 9th and 10th will receive two lottery balls as a reward for staying competitive and making the play-in bracket, which is actually a stronger consolation for narrowly missing out on the playoffs.In contrast, the seventh and eighth seeds receive only one lottery ball if they fail to advance through the play-in round, as they are considered the strongest of the non-playoff teams and therefore least in need of draft aid.The overhaul also restructured the late lottery picks, with picks 12, 13 and 14 actually being reserved for teams that narrowly missed the playoffs and were often described as “the best of the rest.” Additionally, it bans protected draft picks in the 12-15 range to ensure traded draft assets are fully realized and introduces safeguards to prevent teams from acquiring consecutive No. 1 picks. Selected once or ranked in the top five multiple times for several consecutive years. There is a partial safety net for the bottom three teams. Although their chances of getting the No. 1 pick will decrease, their draft pick will not be lower than No. 12.

Why the coalition thinks this will change behavior

The central idea behind the overhaul is rooted in behavior rather than pure math, as the league seeks to reduce the incentives for teams to lose on purpose while improving competitiveness across the league. A team finishing near the bottom of the season will no longer benefit from falling further down the table. In fact, it has a case to win and move out of the bottom three with low lottery odds. Meanwhile, teams outside of the bottom tier will have an incentive to continue competing because their position, rather than a worse position, will now have the best chance of landing a top prospect. As Charania reported, league officials believe the system will “encourage winning, especially in the second half of the season,” since tanking behavior has historically been most apparent at this time.

Timetable and what happens next

The proposal has not yet been finalized. The NBA Board of Governors is expected to vote on May 28, and the system may still undergo minor adjustments before it is officially adopted. If approved, the changes would take effect starting with the 2027 NBA Draft and have a built-in review period. The proposal includes a so-called sunset provision, meaning the system would run through the 2029 draft before the league decides whether to continue the system or introduce further changes. That timeline is consistent with the current collective bargaining agreement, which runs through the 2029-30 season.

League attempts to rebalance incentives

The NBA has tweaked its draft system before, most recently in 2019, but this proposal represents a more direct attempt to reshape incentives across the league. At its core, the issue is not just competitive balance, but credibility. When teams are seen as benefiting from losing, it affects how fans, players and business partners view the league. Silver acknowledged the decision had “business implications, basketball implications, [and] Integrity Impact,” adding that the alliance is committed to addressing the issue. The “3-2-1 draw” is by far the clearest sign of how hard the NBA is willing to go to make this happen, by ensuring that over the course of a season, trying to win once again becomes the most rational strategy.

WHCD Shootings: What happened to the meals after the tragedy? “They’re freeze-dried…”

0

Thousands of meals remain undelivered during this period White House Press dinner, gunfire rang out outside the venue Washington Hilton Hotel The dance hall caused panic and caused the annual event to end prematurely.

US President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, White House Press Secretary Carolyn Leavitt and CBS News Senior Correspondent Jiang Weijia attended the White House Correspondents Association annual dinner in Washington, DC, the United States on April 25, 2026. Reuters/Jonathan Ernst (REUTERS)
US President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, White House Press Secretary Carolyn Leavitt and CBS News Senior Correspondent Jiang Weijia attended the White House Correspondents Association annual dinner in Washington, DC, the United States on April 25, 2026. Reuters/Jonathan Ernst(REUTERS)

Attendees of the dinner were treated to a first course—a spring pea and burrata salad—but not the entrees of Chateaubriand steak and Maine lobster. However, the food was not wasted.

Hilton contributed approximately 2,600 dinners that were not served at Hilton properties world health centerJiang Weijia, CBS News reporter and president of the White House Correspondents Association, said. “They freeze-dried the steaks and lobsters to extend their shelf life and then sent them to two shelters for abused women and children.”

“I’m very grateful to the staff who worked all night under terrible conditions,” Jiang said.

The meals were donated to the shelter in Clifton, said Steve Toma, executive director of the association. virginiaand Calvert County, Maryland.

Also read: Cole Tomas Allen Net Worth: Everything We Know About WH Shooting Suspect, ‘Highly Educated Mentor’ from California

Video of woman stealing alcohol goes viral after WHCD shooting

In an unusual incident at the 2026 White House Correspondents’ Dinner, a woman was seen collecting wine bottles from a table after gunfire broke out at the prestigious gathering. Top officials, including President Donald Trump, quickly evacuated the area, while other attendees, including invitees and reporters, sought shelter.

However, an unidentified blond woman wearing a black fur coat chose to snatch the bottle from the table first. The incident was caught on camera, leading to widespread criticism of her actions. Since the shooting occurred relatively early in the incident, a large amount of wine remained on the table.

“So, members of the media stealing bottles: this is the media! Disgusting!” one X user wrote, sharing a video of the incident.

“Lol… to be fair… I’ll buy a bottle or two on my way out too,” another wrote, backing up the claim, while a third added, “They paid for the seats. The wine is theirs. I bet they’re starving.”

CAA superagent Michael Glantz also drew attention as he enjoyed a salad amid the chaos.

The attacker was identified as 31-year-old Cole Allen.

Vantara offers to take in 80 dying Colombian hippos

0

Colombia Authorization has been granted to kill 80 hippopotamuses from the Magdalena River Basin, with the animals classified as an invasive species. Authorities say the hippos, descendants of hippos introduced in the 1980s, threaten biodiversity, damage ecosystems and pose risks to local communities. oneAnant Ambani, founder of Jamnagar-based Vantara, urged Colombia to end the hunt and offer to fund and manage scientific, humane translocations. Vantara said it will provide veterinary support, capture and transport expertise, biosecurity protocols and lifelong care for all 80 hippos.