A rare and tense exchange took place at the scene Supreme Court On Thursday, Justice Sonia Sotomayor strongly criticized the majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito in the asylum case.
So what happened between Alito and Sotomayor?
Justice Samuel Alito’s sharp response Judge Sonia Sotomayor On Thursday, she reportedly expressed strong disapproval of his majority opinion in the asylum case hills.
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 along ideological lines that the Trump administration can turn away asylum seekers before they reach U.S. soil.
Before Sotomayor spoke, Alito briefly summarized the court’s majority opinion in Mullin v Al Otro Lado. according to new york postAlito’s opinion said the government could deny immigrants entry at the border and then give them a chance to apply for asylum.
Alito’s reaction as Sotomayor read her dissent
As Sotomayor sat on the bench reading her 35-page objection, Alito spent more time than her colleagues leaning back in his chair, rocking back and forth, staring at the ceiling and at times appearing to close his eyes, The Hill reported.
As Sotomayor criticized the majority’s views as “extremely wrong,” Alito leaned forward in his chair, resting his chin on his hands and staring at the ceiling.
When Sotomayor commented on the majority opinion’s language referring to “arrival” in the context of immigration, and used the example of landing Reagan washington National Airport, Alito briefly set his sights on Sotomayor.
After Sotomayor finished speaking, Alito quietly cleared his throat in a rare off-the-cuff response. Alito looked upset and said that if he had known she would read her objection in its entirety, “I would have added more to my comments.”
Alito also urged people to read his full opinion to see how he responded to Sotomayor’s arguments. He also noted that the immigration policies at the heart of the case have been adopted by both Democratic and Republican administrations. However, he said no more, adding: “I won’t add anything more.”
Also read: Who is James Shuford Price III? Raleigh businessman pleads guilty in $60M health care fraud case
The case is at the center of the conflict
Alito began by briefly summarizing his majority opinion in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, which held that the government has the authority to return immigrants stopped at the U.S. border before giving them a chance to apply for asylum, the New York Post reported.
The court ruled 6-3 on ideological grounds. trump card The government turns over those seeking asylum in the United States before they reach U.S. soil.
In Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, the court ruled that the “metering” practice, which limits the number of people who can apply for asylum each day, is legal under federal law, which allows immigrants to seek protection on U.S. soil regardless of whether they entered the country legally.
Alito wrote three of the four majority opinions issued by the Supreme Court on Thursday and summarized each one. In a separate case, Alito ruled that the Trump administration could end Temporary Protected Status for immigrants from Haiti and Syria, meaning they could lose protection from deportation.
It is not routine practice for the justices to read dissenting opinions from the justices, but they are occasionally done to express strong dissent from a majority ruling.
