Tuesday, June 30, 2026
Home Blog Page 75

‘Her job is to cry’: Candace Owens breaks down in tears to Erica Kirk during emotional on-air episode over Charlie Kirk death question

0

"Her job is to cry": Candace Owens breaks down in tears to Erika Kirk as she gets emotional on air over Charlie Kirk's death
Candace Owens criticized Erica Kirke’s emotional reaction on air while discussing the ongoing controversy surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death. Owens believes public sympathy has been repeatedly used to deflect questions about the case, describing Erica as an “emotional asset” and claiming her reactions have become predictable. The comments sparked debate online, with some defending Erica’s grief and others supporting Owens’ call for continued review of unresolved issues surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death.

Public debate surrounding the investigation Charlie KirkErica Kirk’s death took another turn for the worse this week after Candace Owens criticized her emotional reaction to audience comments on air. The comments quickly sparked discussion online, with supporters and critics weighing in on whether grief should be kept away from public scrutiny.Owens has repeatedly raised questions about various aspects of the case in recent months, using her platform to argue that emotional appeals are increasingly part of the broader conversation. Her latest comments come after Erika Kirk appeared visibly emotional while answering questions related to the current controversy.

Candace Owens reacts to Erica Kirk’s emotional moment

Instead of focusing on the details of the investigation itself, Owens focused her response on what she described as a recurring pattern. She said on the show that public sympathy was used to distract from the issue of Charlie Kirk’s death.Owens said:“Why does it seem like the closer you are to God, the harder it is for the devil to deal with you? Yeah. Look, for those of you who can’t see, I have the privilege and benefit of knowing Erica and Charlie very well. I totally know why Erica is in tears, you know. Man. Like I said, this is a weekly installment, okay?”“It was a weekly issue and we had a pastor tell us, we were told this was a demonic thing, oh my god, the devil wants to do this, and in that moment I just want to be with my kids, devil, you don’t just want to be with your kids, so that’s an irrelevant question. You should say the next question.”“Erica is indeed who she is described in the War Department Executive Office email. She is just an emotional asset and every time she gets emotional her emotions just keep building. Her job is to cry and then let us get scolded and it is our fault she cried because how dare we try to find out who killed her husband? That’s what she did this weekend. Again, this is true every week. You can set a timer.The comments immediately drew attention on social media, with users debating Owens’ characterization of Erika Kirk and the broader tone of the discussion.

Charlie Kirk investigation remains at center of controversy

While Owens’ comments made headlines, the bigger issue is the unsolved mystery surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death. Public interest in the case remains high, and each new development continues to be closely watched by commentators, supporters and critics alike.Some believe Ms. Kirk’s emotional reaction is the personal cost of enduring a highly public tragedy that has been under the microscope. Some say public figures caught up in a high-profile investigation should prepare for tough questions and heightened scrutiny.The conflict illustrates a growing divide in how viewers view the ongoing conversation. One view is that emotion is an inevitable consequence of grief. The second is that emotions hinder investigation or criticism of public issues.As the debate surrounding the case continues, Owens’ latest comments add another layer of controversy to an already polarizing story, ensuring that the investigation and public response surrounding the case remains firmly in the spotlight.

LAPD dog shooting: Jameson’s owner demands ‘accountability’ after calling beloved pooch ‘naughty little teddy bear’

0

The owner is jamesona dog was killed by an LAPD officer Canoga Park Apartment Complex On June 13, she recalled her beloved dog as a “lovable, happy, innocent dog who was deeply cherished,” emphasizing that he “never showed aggression To anyone. Jameson was shot when police responded to a report of a woman screaming in their home. However, the screams did not come from any danger, but from the excitement of the New York Knicks winning the 2026 NBA Finals.

Owner of family dog ​​Jameson killed by LAPD demands 'accountability' (Photo by Marie Marseille, GoFundMe)
Owner of family dog ​​Jameson killed by LAPD demands ‘accountability’ (Photo by Marie Marseille, GoFundMe)

Los Angeles Police Department officers arrived at the complex and spoke with Jameson’s owner, Mary Massey, asking her to protect the dog. When she closed and reopened the door, 2.1⁄2-year-old Kim St. Bernard Doodle walked out of the apartment. Police said the dog charged at an officer, causing them to shoot him.

In an interview with Hindustan Times, Mary said: “I don’t remember him barking. I really don’t remember. Jameson didn’t bark when someone rang the doorbell or knocked on our door. It all happened in a matter of seconds. I was home alone with Jameson and my two cats when I responded to a noise complaint for the police. Jameson slipped out from between my legs and within seconds, he was gone.”

“Within seconds, my life changed forever,” the heartbroken dog mom added.

“I want to know why this happens”

Mary is now calling for a “transparent and impartial investigation into what happened that night”.

“What I want most is the truth,” she said. “I want to know why this happens and if it can be avoided.”

The incident sparked a backlash on social media and the LAPD was criticized for its actions. A heartbreaking video circulating on social media shows Mary sitting on the floor next to Jameson’s body and crying.

However, despite people’s anger, Mary said officers showed empathy and compassion in the aftermath of the tragedy.

“I believe a sergeant or other senior officer came over to talk to me about the incident. He expressed his condolences for my loss and asked me to return to my apartment so they could begin their investigation. Throughout the evening, two female officers stayed with me at my door. They were genuine, compassionate, and expressed their apologies multiple times for what had happened. Their kindness and compassion meant so much to me during such an unimaginable time, and I am truly grateful for their support,” Mary said.

“I’m still trying to cope with the unimaginable pain of losing my child,” she added. “For Jameson, justice means accountability. It means ensuring that no other family has to experience this kind of heartbreak and trauma.”

“He had a gentle spirit and a goofy streak.”

Mary remembers Jameson as “the sweetest, cutest, most playful little teddy bear” who was “a big part of my daily life.”

“He brought joy wherever he went. I worked at a Kaiser Permanente near my home. My son would drive me to work most days and pick me up. Jameson would always come for a ride. He would stick his head out the window and people would just fawn over him. Ask to pet him and take pictures. His sweet-natured, goofy personality makes people smile instantly. Everyone in our building knows his name,” she said.

ALSO READ | JUSTICE FOR JAMESON: GoFundMe launched for dog killed by LAPD during Knicks victory celebration, ‘The cutest boy…’

“He loved to cuddle, play and be close to me. We also had two cats, and I always say I love all my kids so much. Jameson was more than just a pet; he was family,” Mary recalled, adding that the tragedy happened “on what should have been a happy moment when I was celebrating the New York Knicks’ championship.”

Los Angeles Police Department’s response

LAPD defends Jameson’s killing statement on social media.

“Police contacted the resident of the apartment; while speaking with the resident, she was approached by a large dog that was barking at officers,” the statement read. “The officer asked her to watch the dog and the resident immediately closed the door. She reopened the door and the dog left the apartment. Once outside the apartment, the dog charged at an officer, resulting in an officer-involved shooting (OIS).”

one to fund me A campaign for the dog said: “Please help us raise funds to get justice for Jameson and pay for his cremation.”

“Initially we only asked for $10,000, but donations have reached astronomical amounts. We didn’t expect anything like this to happen,” Mary said.

As of this writing, $140,863 of the $10,000 goal has been raised.

‘Surgery has gone into his brain’: Collarbone slams online, claims IShow Speed ​​gave Cristiano Ronaldo career

0

"These programs are entering his brain": Collarbone slammed online after claiming IShowSpeed ​​gave Cristiano Ronaldo his career
Broadcaster Collarbone has sparked a backlash after claiming he only knew Cristiano Ronaldo because of IShow Speed ​​and suggesting speed “empowered” the football icon’s career. The comments quickly went viral, sparking a strong reaction from fans. Many consider Ronaldo to be one of the most famous athletes in history long before Speed’s rise to fame. While some acknowledged Speed’s influence among younger viewers, most users dismissed Collarbone’s comments and defended Ronaldo’s global legacy.

cristiano ronaldoIts impact on modern football is rarely questioned, but a recent comment from streamer Collarbone certainly did that. A video circulating on social media has sparked thousands of reactions after the content creator suggested he knew ronaldo Because of IShowSpeed, there are even claims that the football icon’s career is partly related to the internet star.The quote quickly went viral on X, with fans, Ronaldo supporters and Speed ​​followers all joining in the debate. While some acknowledge IShowSpeed’s role in introducing Ronaldo to younger audiences, many believe Collarbone’s argument goes far beyond what most fans would consider reasonable.

Collarbone Cristiano Ronaldo comments spark controversy

The controversy started when Collarbone shared his thoughts on Ronaldo and IShowSpeed ​​on live broadcast. His comments immediately attracted attention because they seemed to reverse the relationship between one of football’s most famous players and one of the internet’s biggest streamers.Collarbone said:“I know Ronaldo, that’s all. I know Ronaldo is the reason for the speed, but I don’t know anything other than that. Yeah. Like, speed really made Ronaldo, man, that’s crazy. Like, in my opinion, Ronaldo needs to show more love for speed. Like, bro really gave him a career, that’s crazy. I’m ugly right now, but that’s OK. Just look at what the other guy’s life is like this week. Just look at what the other guy’s life is like this week.”The video quickly attracted attention as Ronaldo’s global fame predates social media influencers by decades. Long before Speed ​​became a household name online, the Portuguese superstar had already won multiple Ballon d’Ors, Champions League titles and international trophies.Still, some users noted that Pace helped introduce Ronaldo to a younger generation of viewers, particularly in North America and those who don’t regularly follow football.

Cristiano Ronaldo fans take to social media to react

The strongest reaction came from fans who felt Collarbone’s statement ignored Ronaldo’s historic impact on the sport. The comments section was filled with jokes, criticism and skepticism as users debated the claim.“Speed ​​has definitely made Ronaldo more relevant to a wider group of people,” one fan wrote, acknowledging the streamer’s influence but not agreeing that he created Ronaldo’s popularity.One user wrote: “It’s crazy to say but speed does make Ronaldo more relevant to more people.”Another fan disagreed, saying: “Quite the opposite. Speed ​​trying to imitate Ronaldo’s celebrations is what really made him famous. Before embracing Ronaldo and the world of football, Speed ​​was just a nobody. “One commentator highlighted Speed’s admiration for the football icon, writing: “It was Speed ​​who made Ronaldo’s goal celebration gesture and it was Speed ​​who cried when he saw Ronaldo.”Another user completely questioned Clavical’s claims, commenting: “Dude I’m not even a football fan, I’m from Malaysia and I’ve known CR7 since I was 10 and now I’m 33 lol. Who is the speed?”Some reactions directly mocked the anchor. One fan wrote: “This guy has two brain cells and they’re fighting each other.”Another added, “The average American has a low IQ. If I didn’t know him, he wouldn’t be popular.”One user joked: “This is hilarious, these programs are already in his brain.”Another commented: “What a loser this must be bait.”The discussion highlighted the growing intersection between sports and internet culture. Few fans would dispute that IShowSpeed ​​has expanded Ronaldo’s popularity among younger viewers. However, the overwhelming response suggested that most viewers believed the relationship was inverse. In their eyes, Pace may have helped celebrate Ronaldo’s legacy online, but Ronaldo’s global reputation was firmly established long before streaming came along.

Hannah Dugan case update: Federal judge upholds conviction; here’s why her appeal won’t work

0

A federal judge refuses to overturn a former Wisconsin circuit judge’s obstruction conviction Hannah Duganshe was found guilty in court of helping an undocumented man evade immigration officials. The ruling upholds Dugan’s felony conviction and moves her closer to sentencing, although she is unlikely to serve any jail time.

Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan
Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan “temporarily relieved” of her duties after illegal immigrants were hid in the courthouse (Lee Matz/Milwaukee Independent, AP) (AP)

Judgments and Judges’ Decisions

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman declined to grant Dugan’s motion for a new trial or to overturn the conviction. Adelman had previously delayed sentencing to consider whether the conviction should be overturned, but ultimately ruled that the original verdict should be upheld. A new sentencing date was not immediately set.

Dugan’s legal team pushed back hard. Her defense said in a statement that “the court’s decision was wrong.” AP News.

On December 19, a federal jury convicted Dugan of felony obstruction of federal agents. She was acquitted of a lesser misdemeanor charge of concealing a person from federal law enforcement. Flores-Ruiz is reportedly currently in federal custody awaiting deportation to Mexico Wao.

Also read: Is California at risk from earthquakes? New study shows pressure on San Andreas fault hits record high

What led to Dugan’s arrest

The case stems from an incident on April 18, 2025, when immigration officials went to milwaukee county The court was informed after it was learned that Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, an undocumented man who had been deported during the Obama administration in 2013, had illegally re-entered the United States and was scheduled to appear in Dugan on a state battery case. Flores-Ruiz pleaded no contest to three counts of misdemeanor battery with a domestic abuse modifier, according to WAOW.

Dugan faced ice Agents outside the court told them their administrative order was not sufficient to arrest Flores-Ruiz and directed them to the chief judge’s office. After the agents left, she led Flores-Ruiz and his attorney through the private jury door, a closed exit, while federal agents waited in the hallway. Agents spotted Flores-Ruiz in the hallway, followed him outside and arrested him after a foot chase. a week later, FBI Agents arrested Dugan at the courthouse and led her out in handcuffs, the Associated Press reported.

Also read: ‘New JD Vance meme’: Viral clip from The View sparks frenzy online

Why a judge refused to overturn Dugan’s conviction

Dugan’s attorneys argued that her conviction should be thrown out based on a federal appeals court ruling in a separate Virginia immigration case that found ICE’s actions did not constitute “pending proceedings” under federal obstruction laws. They argue there is no such pending lawsuit against Flores-Ruiz, only an arrest warrant.

Judge Adelman disagreed, ruling that the attempted arrest did count as pending litigation because it was a planned, targeted operation rather than a random encounter. “The defendants argue that ICE is acting here as a law enforcement agency,” Adelman wrote, according to AP News. “But that ignores the fact that, unlike agencies like the FBI, ICE can issue its own warrants, adjudicate and effect deportations, as it did with Flores-Ruiz, without the involvement of the courts. That’s important.”

Dugan, 67, faces up to five years in prison, but is widely expected to receive probation given her clean criminal record and nonviolent convictions. She resigned from the bench two weeks after her conviction amid Republican impeachment threats, AP News reported.

Kohen Wiley Update: Senatobia police officer shot amid outrage over 1-year-old’s death

0

A one-year-old boy from Senatobia, mississippi On Sunday (June 14), while police were responding to a shooting at a Walmart, an officer accidentally fired into a vehicle and was fatally shot. The deceased toddler’s family identified him as Kohen Wiley.

One-year-old Kohen Wiley was allegedly shot and killed by police at a traffic stop in Mississippi. (Cohen Wiley Family)
One-year-old Kohen Wiley was allegedly shot and killed by police at a traffic stop in Mississippi. (Cohen Wiley Family)

this die Wiley’s actions sparked outrage on social media, especially in Senatobia, a community bordering Tennessee just 40 miles south of Memphis. The boy’s parents and community advocates launched a campaign demanding justice.

The Mississippi Bureau of Investigation is investigating the case. The Senatobia Police Department also released a statement on social media acknowledging their officers’ involvement in the shooting and noting their commitment to “full transparency.” But details about the officer who fired into the vehicle have not yet been released.

However, although there has been no official confirmation, family members and community members involved in the event have linked an officer to the shooting.

As the case heats up, police officers are under scanner

Although it has not been officially confirmed, an officer with the Senatobia Police Department has been implicated in the shooting of one-year-old Kohen Wiley. Maguire Bridges, whom The Associated Press described as a “community advocate helping the family,” was one of many people who identified the officer.

Also read: Will Trump close the Department of Education in 2026? Polymarket odds rise after latest restructure

in a Post on Facebook, Marquell Bridges said the officer who shot Kohen Wiley was Hunter Foster, who according to his LinkedIn profile was a patrol officer with the Senatobia Police Department. Several others also shared it via social media.

“Hunter Foster, the officer who shot and killed one-year-old Cohen Cartier Wiley, was the subject of a complaint from an officer for using a racial slur at the police station just days before he shot and killed one-year-old Cohen Wiley,” Bridges wrote in the post.

Ht.com was unable to independently verify Officer Hunter Foster’s claims related to the case.

Also read: Is California at risk from earthquakes? New study shows pressure on San Andreas fault hits record high

What do the authorities say?

The Mississippi Bureau of Investigation said in a statement that police mistook a vehicle carrying Cohen Wiley, his mother and a friend of his mother’s for suspects fleeing the shooting parking lot. The three were preparing to leave the parking lot.

“The driver drove in the direction of the officers and nearly hit an officer,” according to the agency. MBI said officers reportedly tried to stop the car and an officer responded by firing into the car. Cohen Wiley was pronounced dead at a nearby hospital.

Meanwhile, family members and community advocates are helping the family refute that account and demand the release of body camera footage of the incident.

California governor slams suggestion that investigation didn’t come from Washington

0

California Gov. Gavin Newsom fired back at the U.S. Justice Department on Tuesday over claims that the federal investigation into him and those in his entourage is long-standing, insisting that he was targeted at the behest of Donald Trump.

California governor slams suggestion that investigation didn't come from Washington
California governor slams suggestion that investigation didn’t come from Washington

Newsom, the likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, on Monday accused the Republican president of launching a criminal investigation into him and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, calling it a “personal vendetta.”

A source at the Justice Department in Washington told AFP that was not the case, insisting that the investigation was not initiated by a “principal judge” but began about a year ago by the US attorney for the Eastern District of California in Sacramento after information from a whistleblower triggered it.

The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the investigation is focused on “tax activities” involving Newsom’s wife, a documentary producer, as well as activities involving his former chief of staff and possible current aides.

Newsom’s former chief of staff, Dana Williamson, pleaded guilty in May to bank and wire fraud and other felony charges stemming from positions she held before working for the governor.

During a media briefing on Tuesday, Newsom blasted “anonymous” sources for trying to confuse the situation.

“Please note the Department of Justice’s specific and consistent use of the word ‘origin’ in anonymous media statements yesterday,” the statement said.

“Under Donald Trump, the Department of Justice has shown a willingness to seize on almost any accusation, no matter how flimsy, to allow political appointees to weaponize the justice system against the president’s enemies.”

-“Looking for Crime”-

Newsom said in a video Monday that federal agents have interviewed friends and colleagues of him and his wife and have been sifting through “years of random documents.”

“Donald Trump is not just coming after me because of my mean tweets,” Newsom said. “He’s coming to me because I’m considering running for president.

“He was going after my wife to get me,” he said.

The California governor noted that since returning to the White House last January, Trump has called for investigations into some of his perceived political opponents.

“Anyone who challenges Donald Trump is on his hit list,” Newsom said.

Newsom’s office noted in a statement Tuesday that Trump has publicly called for the governor’s arrest and claimed his allies are distorting reality to try to fulfill his boss’s wishes.

“Trump’s political appointees are pressuring prosecutors to build cases against Governor Newsom and the First Partner, and federal investigators have been looking for evidence of ‘wrongdoing.’

“Trump’s Justice Department picked a target and began looking for criminal conduct.”

California Sen. Alex Padilla condemned the investigation into his fellow Democrats.

“The Trump administration’s decision to investigate Governor Newsom fits a pattern: speak out against the president, hold him accountable for his corruption and failures, and then you become a target,” Padilla posted on X.

“Every American should be shocked when the nation’s top law enforcement agency is reduced to a tool of political revenge rather than an independent agency charged with impartial law enforcement.”

bur-hg/jgc

This article was generated from automated news agency feeds without modifications to the text.

Will Trump close the Department of Education in 2026? Polymarket odds rise after latest restructure

0

Polymarket says there’s about an 8% chance Donald Trump The U.S. Department of Education will end the program at the end of this year. The Trump administration is already splitting up some of the Department of Education’s work and moving it to other agencies, and has begun betting on a total shutdown.

Trump shifted responsibilities from the Education Department to the Justice Department and the Department of Health and Human Services, sparking debate over its future. (Reuters/Representative photo) (Reuters)
Trump shifted responsibilities from the Education Department to the Justice Department and the Department of Health and Human Services, sparking debate over its future. (Reuters/Representative photo) (Reuters)

The Ministry of Education transfers power to the Ministry of Justice

Shares rose after the Justice Department now has authority to handle civil rights enforcement in education cases, according to an announcement Tuesday from Trumo’s government. The announcement also said the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will take over special education programs and responsibilities.

As part of the reorganization, the Justice Department will also address student privacy protections and provide training and advice to schools, the statement added.

Trump plans to transfer control of education

Trump has long said he wants to close the Department of Education and transfer control of education back to the states. However, only the U.S. Congress, not the president alone, has the authority to fully shut down the Department of Education.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon, the former CEO of WWE, has been working on agreements with other federal agencies to shift departmental responsibilities away from the Education Department, according to the Associated Press. McMahon said in a written statement that the changes are intended to match responsibilities with agencies better able to handle these issues and reduce the federal government’s control over outcomes.

Also read: Will the US-Iran peace deal include a $30 billion reconstruction fund? What we know so far

Prior to this latest move, the government had already established 10 earlier agreements to transfer Department of Education projects to other agencies.

Office of Special Education and Civil Rights Impacted

The two main offices affected are the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services and the Office of Civil Rights, which are currently being reorganized under the plan, according to the Associated Press. The Office of Special Education manages billions of dollars in grants and inspects states for compliance with disability education laws. Office for Civil Rights investigates discrimination complaints at schools, colleges across U.S.

EdTrust, a think tank in Washington, D.C., warned that the changes could weaken accountability and create chaos in education services, the Associated Press reported. EdTrust also said students from disadvantaged groups such as students with disabilities, black students, Latino students, low-income students, multilingual students and rural students are most likely to be affected.

Union warns of chaos at schools

Rachel Gittleman, head of the department’s employee union, said the move could cause confusion at home and in schools and reduce protections for students who face discrimination, The Associated Press reported. She also warned that some students and families may be unable to access vital services they rely on.

Trump isn’t quite done yet Ministry of Educationbut his administration is slowly shifting power to other federal agencies, which is why debate over its future is growing.

Mrbeast: MrBeast’s $1M Challenge Winner Philip DeFranco Plans to Offer Massive Giveaways to Subscribers

0

MrBeast's $1M Challenge Winner Philip DeFranco Plans to Offer Massive Giveaways to Subscribers

Philip DeFranco has announced that he plans to donate the entire $1 million he won in MrBeast’s recent YouTuber Challenge. The longtime creator shared the news in a TikTok video on June 16, saying the money would go to his subscribers instead of staying in his own pocket. DeFranco said 40 people will each receive $25,000, but he has not yet explained how fans can enter the giveaway.The surprising news comes shortly after DeFranco became the winner of the MrBeast 50 YouTuber Challenge. DeFranco admitted he never expected to win the competition and was shocked to be invited in the first place. He said he originally joined because he wanted to see what MrBeast production was like behind the scenes, believing he would likely be eliminated early in the competition.

Philip DeFranco says subscribers will receive $1 million he won from MrBeast

DeFranco explains in the video that winning the challenge was never part of his plan. With 50 creators competing, he figured his chances of making it far were slim. Instead, he survived round after round, eventually winning the entire tournament and the $1 million prize.After his win, DeFranco decided to donate the money to those who had supported him throughout his career. He said the giveaway was for his subscribers, whom he often referred to as “Beautiful Bastard” of Franco’s country. His current plan is to divide the money evenly among the 40 winners, at $25,000 each.While talking about the challenge, DeFranco also shared an unexpected account of what happened during the game. He said after filming ended, he learned that some creators might receive money to vote against him in the final stages of the competition. DeFranco referenced comments from fellow creator JC Caylen, who said on the live stream that he was allegedly offered money not to vote for DeFranco.DeFranco said he was unaware of any alleged efforts to influence the vote during the time of the challenge. He also thanked the creators who supported him and helped him achieve the final victory.For now, fans will have to wait for more information about the giveaway. Although prize money has been reserved for subscribers, DeFranco has yet to announce the entry process. He said more details would be announced soon, giving viewers the chance to compete for a share of the $1 million prize in the MrBeast Challenge.

Is California at risk from earthquakes? New study shows pressure on San Andreas fault hits record high

0

Stress levels along two major fault lines Southern California Earthquakes have climbed to their highest levels in more than a thousand years, according to new research from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, raising new concerns about seismic risks in one of Hawaii’s most densely populated areas. USA.

A new study finds fault stress along the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults in Southern California. (Unsplash/representative)
A new study finds fault stress along the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults in Southern California. (Unsplash/representative)

The findings were published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth This was emphasized in a press release issued by the university on June 10.

“Our results indicate that stress levels on multiple fault segments are now at or above their highest values ​​over the past millennium, and that large-scale outright ruptures involving both fault systems could occur in the region,” lead author Liliane Burkhard said in a statement.

How did scientists come to this conclusion?

The researchers built a physics-based computer model that simulates how pressure builds up and is released along the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault systems, including the key intersection between the two regions, Cajon Pass, which is located 63 miles northeast of the San Andreas fault system. Los AngelesEvery people.

To build the model, the scientists used 1,000 years of earthquake history gleaned from geological evidence, including radiocarbon dating and tree-ring records. They then used the model to estimate how much stress had accumulated on the fault today.

The study found that there have been 36 earthquakes of magnitude 6.4 or above in the Los Angeles area over the past 1,000 years. These include the 1857 magnitude 7.9 Fort Tejon earthquake, the last major earthquake to occur in the region. Today, approximately 13 million people live in the Los Angeles area.

“Currently, pressures in the region are at historically high levels, and more than 160 years have passed since the last major rupture, and the system is under critical load,” Burkhard said.

Also read: ‘New JD Vance meme’: Viral clip from The View sparks frenzy online

How the Cajon Pass could affect future earthquakes

One of the study’s most important findings involves Cajon Pass, which the researchers say can act as an “earthquake gate,” sometimes blocking large ruptures from crossing both fault systems and sometimes allowing them to pass, thus involving both faults in a single event.

“The conditions that determine whether the Cajon Pass ‘seismic door’ opens or remains closed appear to be related to how well the stress levels on the two fault systems align with each other at the time of rupture,” Burkhard explained.

The study found that pressures normally released by large earthquakes instead continued to increase to what the researchers called “unprecedented levels.” Simultaneous rupture of the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults could be far more destructive than a single fault event, affecting densely populated areas including Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside and the Coachella Valley.

The San Andreas Fault is the major boundary between the Pacific and North American plates and stretches for about 650 miles. Other faults include the Hayward Fault, which branches off it, According to ABC7 News.

Also read: FBI warns Microsoft 365 users about dangerous Kali365 phishing scam: How it works and how to stay safe

Why scientists say these findings are still important

Scientists say the research is not about predicting when earthquakes will strike, but about improving understanding of the risks faced by millions of people.

“This is not a prediction of when an earthquake will occur,” Burkhard said. “However, studies like this make important contributions to national and global earthquake hazard research because we are using rigorous quantitative science to better understand the risks faced by millions of people.”

The researchers believe the findings will help improve earthquake hazard assessment, emergency preparedness and infrastructure planning.

What do you do in Boston on a Saturday night? Former US diplomat says F-1 visas may be denied due to this issue

0

What do you do in Boston on a Saturday night? Former US diplomat says F-1 visas may be denied due to this issue
An F-1 visa applicant said he was asked during his visa interview what he was going to do in Boston on Saturday, only to have his visa denied.

Amid a sharp rise in student visa rejections in India, former US diplomat Yvette Bansal says it’s possible your visa could be rejected due to an unexpected informal question for which you are not prepared. Bansal was speaking to YouTuber Pritesh Jagani, who said he received a message from a student who applied for an F1 visa at the consulate in Kolkata. The applicant was asked “What would you do in Boston on a Saturday night?” after the applicant said he had chosen a college in Boston. He was also asked how well he knew Boston.Basically, an F-1 visa applicant is asked three questions: the name of the college to which he is applying, how much he knows about Boston, and what he will be doing in Boston on Saturday night. The applicant said he applied to Northeastern University in Boston; he knew Boston well and it was around New Year’s when his classes started. The third question made him a little nervous, and he thought of a few things, and then he said he was going to the library, hanging out on campus, and probably studying.Yvette Bansal said that if a visa officer asks such a question, then he or she wants the applicant to come off their script. Bansal said they want to check whether applicants have researched their city because serious students do. It also checks whether applicants are being thrown off and whether they maintain their ability to express themselves clearly. It’s a tough and smart question with no right or wrong answer, Bansal said. “There’s no wrong answer. It should just show that you are a student and have done basic research about the city you are going to,” said the former visa officer.Regarding the overall increase in rejection of F-1 visa applications in India, Bansal said, “The government is not keen on immigration, so there has been a tightening of policies on the part of the country and that has affected consulates and embassies in India. There is no big push from the US to approve more visas. There is no pressure on the ambassador to instruct the consulates in the embassy to approve more F-1 visas.” They may be told that these applications require a higher level of review. “