Saudi Arabia has suspended travel and visas to the Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda and South Sudan.
Saudi Arabia has banned its citizens from traveling to three African countries, including the Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda and South Sudan, and suspended the issuance of all visas to travelers from those countries as part of new measures to prevent the spread of Ebola.The restrictions announced by the Saudi Public Health Authority (Weqaya) also apply to travelers arriving via third countries, provided they have visited any of the three affected countries within the 21 days before entering the kingdom, the Saudi Gazette reported.Authorities said the measures were taken to reduce the risk of Ebola entering Saudi Arabia amid ongoing outbreaks in parts of Africa.Waikaya said the Kingdom’s health surveillance and response system continues to operate around the clock in coordination with national and international health agencies to monitor developments and protect public health.Saudi Arabia has stepped up health precautions for travelers arriving from neighboring countries including Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania and the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville). These include enhanced health screening at points of entry, enhanced surveillance and early response procedures.The public health situation in Saudi Arabia remains stable, authorities said, confirming that no suspected or confirmed Ebola cases have been recorded in the country since preventive measures were introduced.Vecaya added that the restrictions are routine precautionary measures designed to protect citizens, residents and visitors while helping to prevent the spread of infectious diseases.
fourth pregnancy USA second lady Usha Vance Attracted attention because of her husband JD Vance’s Current term. The vice president recently defended his wife after a New York Times article speculated on the political significance of her maternity wear — a suggestion that Usha has since publicly rejected.
US Vice President J.D. Vance defended his wife Usha based on a New York Times article analyzing the political significance of Usha’s maternity wear (AFP)
J.D. Vance responded to the article with a joke, saying his wife could buy a $50 Old Navy coral maternity dress for just $8.75 and saying her budgeting skills make her qualified to be the next federal budget director.
“She spent $8.75 on a $50 dress. America: meet your next federal budget director!” Vance responded to the second lady’s post on social media platform X.
The controversy first came to attention on the second lady’s podcast “Storytime with the Second Lady,” in which special guests read accessible children’s stories with Usha and “inspired a lifelong love of reading,” according to the channel’s official synopsis.
Usha wore a figure-hugging old navy dress for the Father’s Day special, which featured her husband. Vanessa Friedman, fashion director of The New York Times, believed the outfit was a thoughtful political statement designed to humanize the vice president and advance the MAGA movement’s stance on feminism and fertility.
Usha responded to the article with humor. “Now that we know the politics of my $8.75 coral Old Navy maternity dress, can’t wait to hear what the New York Times has to say about my elastic waistband pants and compression socks! In the meantime, enjoy my pregnancy fashion (or lack thereof) and tell a good story with your little ones at Storytime with the Second Lady,” she wrote.
She later shared a receipt for the dress to further emphasize her point.
The New York Times article titled “The Politics and Power of Pregnancy Images” compared Usha’s maternity clothes to those of two other important White House figures: the Secretary of State. Caroline Levitt and Katie MillerWife of Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Millerthe two happened to be pregnant at the same time as the second lady.
Friedman’s MAGA argument
Friedman began the article by stressing the significance of Vance’s pregnancy, noting that it was the first public pregnancy in a vice presidential family since Skyler Colfax’s wife, Ellen Colfax, in 1870.
Friedman writes: “It is undoubtedly a coincidence that three such prominent women in the MAGA movement became pregnant at nearly the same time. But for an administration that had such an intuitive and strategic understanding of the power of aesthetics that it established an unspoken dress code that men dress in the image of the president, it also became a persuasive mandate.”
She believes that women’s maternity clothing has become “a picture of the White House platform for family and childbirth” and may “provide an idealized image of womanhood and a literal image for the birthivist movement.”
Friedman then contrasted their approach with that of the spouses of previous political leaders, including Cherie Blair, wife of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and Jacqueline Kennedy, wife of former U.S. President John F. Kennedy, both of whom opted for looser silhouettes during their pregnancies. She describes the current trend as “a departure from the traditional wifely aesthetic.”
Leavitt recently returned from maternity leave after giving birth to her first child on May 1, while Miller welcomed the couple’s fourth child on June 3. Usha Vance is expected to give birth to her baby sometime in July.
MacKenzie Scott donated approximately $7 billion to charitable causes across the United States in 2025, cementing her status as one of the world’s most generous philanthropists. Scott’s gifts account for nearly a third of the country’s $19.2 billion in major charitable giving this year, according to Giving USA and the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. The donations are part of a record year for U.S. philanthropy, which totaled $617.2 billion. Although Scott made the largest charitable contribution of any individual donor in 2025, she continued her long-standing practice of giving quietly, avoiding publicity while supporting thousands of organizations for a variety of causes.
MacKenzie Scott became the largest individual philanthropist in the United States in 2025, giving away approximately $7 billion. Her gifts accounted for about one-third of the year’s $19.2 billion in major charitable giving. Other major donors include Michael Bloomberg, who gave $4.3 billion, Bill Gates, who gave $3.7 billion, Warren Buffett, who gave $1.34 billion, and Susan and Michael Dell, who gave nearly $1 billion. Over the past five years, Scott’s cumulative charitable giving has reached approximately $26.2 billion.According to the Giving USA Philanthropy Annual Report, Americans donated approximately $617.2 billion to charity in 2025, a 5.7% increase from the previous year after adjusting for inflation. The total includes donations from individuals, foundations, corporations and charitable bequests. Sectors receiving the greatest support include religion, education, human services, health, international affairs, arts and culture, reflecting widespread growth across nearly all categories of charitable organizations.
Why Mackenzie Scott isn’t on the Philanthropy 50 list
Although Scott gave more than anyone else during the year, he does not appear on the Chronicle of Philanthropy’s annual Philanthropy 50 list. The publication explains that its rankings rely on publicly available information and voluntary disclosures. Scott and her representatives declined to provide details about donations made through donor-advised funds, making it impossible to determine whether those donations fit the publication’s methodology. As a result, despite her substantial charitable contributions, she was excluded.
Different ways of charity
Since declaring his commitment to philanthropy following his divorce from Amazon founder Jeff Bezos in 2019, Scott has taken an unconventional approach to charitable giving. She typically provides unrestricted grants rather than requiring lengthy applications or imposing detailed conditions, letting recipient organizations decide how best to use the funds. Her donations support thousands of nonprofits working in areas such as affordable housing, education, racial equity, disaster recovery, public health and community development.
What motivated Mackenzie Scott to donate?
Scott has said repeatedly that her philanthropy is driven by personal experiences and kindness she received early in her life. In an article published in December 2025, she recalled that a college roommate once loaned her $1,000 so she could continue attending school, and when she couldn’t afford it, the dentist provided free treatment. Such acts of generosity can have lasting ripple effects, she writes, arguing that non-transactional kindness is often undervalued despite its long-term social benefits. Scott also noted that scientific research shows that generosity and kindness help increase happiness and improve well-being.
this donation pledge and her growing legacy.
After their divorce, Scott signed the Giving Pledge, a pledge co-written by Bill Gates, Melinda France Gates and Warren Buffett that encourages billionaires to give away the majority of their wealth during their lifetime or through an inheritance. Although Scott has given away more than $26 billion, the appreciation in Amazon stock means her estimated net worth remains closer to $35 billion. Her sustained philanthropy has made her one of the most influential charitable donors of modern times, setting the benchmark for large-scale, trust-based giving that does not seek public recognition.
JD Vance and his wife Usha Vance discuss her $8.75 old navy dress
Vice President of the United States JD Vance He used his wife’s cheap maternity clothes to gain political support on federal spending after US second lady Usha Vance mocked a New York Times column that analyzed the “political symbolism” of her pregnancy clothing.In an X post on Thursday, Vance shared a photo of a receipt showing his wife purchased a $50 Old Navy maternity dress for $8.75 and wrote: “America: meet your next federal budget director!”Usha Vance made the comment in critic Vanessa Friedman’s New York Times fashion column “The Politics and Power of Pregnancy Images,” which explores three prominent women in the Trump administration: second lady and White House press secretary Caroline Leavitt and Katie Miller, wife of deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. How they publicly revealed their pregnancies at almost the same time.Friedman believed this pattern was intentional, writing that these women “created an apparently consistent and even somewhat paradigm-shifting image of the White House’s family and parenthood platform.” She added that Usha Vance was doing her part to humanize the vice president by highlighting her pregnancy.Usha Vance responded pointedly to Friedman’s article: “Now that we know the politics of my $8.75 coral maternity dress from Old Navy, I can’t wait to hear what the New York Times has to say about my elastic waist pants and compression stockings,” she wrote on the X, along with the receipt.J.D. Vance’s federal budget playfully frames the exchange as a broader statement about fiscal restraint, perfectly in line with the administration’s economic message to the working class. With household expenses still a top concern for American voters, the vice president’s wife buying an $8 dress instead of designer maternity clothes reinforced the image of the everyday person the administration has been trying to project.Ironically, J.D. Vance has been one of the Trump administration’s most outspoken advocates of U.S. manufacturing, blaming previous administrations for deciding that “America will no longer be a manufacturing powerhouse” and leaving it to “the rest of the world to make the necessities our homes and families need.” Old Navy, which is owned by Gap Inc., makes the vast majority of its clothing overseas, particularly in Vietnam, China, Bangladesh and India.
Norman Rockwell’s 1943 masterpiece So You Want to Meet the President! ” now on public display in Washington, D.C.
One of Norman Rockwell’s finest works is on public display for the first time, a mesmerizing blend of American history, courtroom drama and unexpected wartime romance. The four-panel “So You Want to Meet the President!” “Created in 1943, it depicts life inside the White House during World War II. For decades, it hung in a private home and later the White House before becoming the center of a long-running ownership dispute. The artwork was purchased for a record $7.25 million in 2025 and is currently on display in the “People’s House: The White House Experience” exhibition in Washington, DC. Visitors can view the work until June 2027.
The story behind Norman Rockwell’s White House painting
Norman Rockwell wrote So You Want to Meet the President! ” In November 1943, he worked for the Saturday Evening Post after being commissioned by Stephen T. Early, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s long-time press secretary. Rather than making Roosevelt the main focus, Rockwell depicts a diverse group of people waiting outside the Oval Office, including reporters, military officers, Secret Service agents, Miss America, and private citizens. Roosevelt only appears in a small sketch in the final image, which reinforces the message that even during wartime, he remained accessible to the American public.Before completing the final painting, Rockwell observed visitors and made detailed sketches inside the West Wing. However, disaster struck in May 1943 when a fire destroyed his studio in Vermont, destroying nearly all the sketches and reference photos he had produced for the project. Rockwell wrote to the White House requesting permission to return and repeat the process. The request was granted, allowing him to recreate the artwork from scratch and eventually publish it later that year.
Wartime details are hidden throughout the painting
This artwork provides a unique glimpse into the atmosphere inside the White House during World War II. Among its many carefully observed details is a gas mask hanging next to a coat rack labeled “Presidential Gas Mask,” reflecting the security concerns of the era. Rockwell’s signature attention to everyday moments and human expressions helped transform The Waiting Room into a vivid portrait of one of America’s most challenging times.
The mystery surrounding Miss America
One of the most controversial figures in the painting is Miss America. The White House Historical Association identified the woman as Rosemary LaPlanche, who won the title of Miss America in 1941. However, the family of Washington beauty queen Marie McIntyre said Rockwell used her as a model for the role. According to her son, Rockwell changed several details in the final artwork, changing her handmade patterned dress to yellow and her blond hair to red, demonstrating the artist’s creative license rather than producing an exact likeness.
How this painting inspired a World War II love story
Illustrations also play an unexpected role in creating lifelong romance. Figures include Navy WAVES member Eloise English, although Rockwell changed the color of her uniform from navy blue to white in the finished painting. Thomas Davies, a fighter pilot who served during World War II, discovered Eloise in the magazine after the artwork appeared in the Saturday Evening Post. He was determined to find her when he returned home, which he eventually did, and the two got married. Their marriage lasted 46 years, making Rockwell’s illustration the unlikely beginning of a real-life love story.
Ownership dispute ends in court
The original painting was a gift from Rockwell to White House Press Secretary Stephen T. Early, who commissioned it. After Earle’s death, the artwork remained in the hands of his family for decades and was displayed in the White House from 1978 to 2022. However, disagreements over ownership eventually led to legal disputes between family members. In 2025, a federal appeals court upheld a ruling declaring Early’s grandson William Elam III the sole owner of the paintings, ending a long dispute.After receiving legal ownership, William Elam III decided to sell the paintings at auction. In November 2025, the White House Historical Association acquired the four-piece artwork for $7.25 million through Heritage Auctions. It became the most expensive acquisition in the society’s history, ensuring that the historic painting remained accessible to the public rather than disappearing into private collections.
Where can I see it now?
The paintings are currently on display at the People’s House: The White House Experience, an interactive museum just one block from the White House in Washington, DC. The exhibition opens on June 25, 2026 and is expected to run through June 2027 as part of the celebration of the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States. Visitors can view the rare Rockwell masterpiece for free, but reservations are recommended.
one shooting According to Lansing reports, michigan Friday, June 26th. Scanner report shows police We are responding to a shooting in the area of E Malcolm X Street.
According to scanner reports, a shooting occurred in Lansing, Michigan. Images used for representational purposes. (no splash)
Scanner audio indicated the shooting occurred on the third floor of a building in the area of East Malcolm X Street and King Avenue. Witnesses told police the suspect fled north from the scene of the shooting, according to scanner audio.
Police reportedly set up a cordon and had K-9 trackers on hand. According to reports, one person injured in the incident was taken to a nearby hospital. Scanner report. At this time, authorities have not issued a formal statement on the shooting.
The condition of the person who was shot is unclear, and no details about the suspect have been released.
Lansing shooting: Reaction overwhelming
Scanner reports are based on Shiawassee Law Dispatch Group calls and provide real-time public safety information based on U.S. Crime Radar. The shooting was also heard on the Scanner Radio app. Several people shared audio dispatches of the same message on X and Facebook.
“I don’t know the details yet, but it’s more than double the usual audience,” one person said wrote on Facebook, and the gun control hashtag “shoot to kill.”
X one person additional “Active Incident: Shooting. I’m listening to ‘Greater Lansing Public Safety.'” Several others shared posts about “active shooting incidents” they heard on the app.
Meanwhile, US Crime Radar notes that officers were following the victim as he was taken to a nearby hospital, reportedly responding to a separate report of a stolen bike and a crashed cyclist along the way.
michigan gun laws
Michigan passed a number of essential gun safety laws in 2023, including the Extreme Risk Act and the Safe Storage Act. The state has long required a license to purchase a handgun. In 2023, a law was passed extending this to long gun sales. In addition, according to Everytown, which focuses on gun control in the United States, Michigan passed a law in 2023 making it illegal for people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence to possess firearms.
A prehistoric hilltop enclosure in southern Spain has revealed to archaeologists two distinct historical moments that occupied the same site. What initially appears to be the remains of an ancient fortified settlement dating back some five thousand years, soon reveals something far more unexpected beneath its weathered stonework. The abandoned complex contains the skeleton of a Roman-era man, some 2,500 years after the original builders of the fortress, UNN reports. The discovery raises a new set of questions, not because the burial itself is unusual, but because of where it occurred. Sites abandoned for thousands of years are sometimes repurposed by later societies, but each such case has its own story. Excavations in Spain offer a rare opportunity to examine how a site played a completely different role in a distant chapter of European history.
inside 5,000-year-old fortress Spain built in the Bronze Age
The remains came to light during archaeological investigations carried out ahead of construction related to the solar project. The site, located in the highlands near Almendralejo in the Extremadura region, has not attracted much attention despite its size.As the excavation expanded, the carefully planned outline of the wall began to emerge. Dating shows that the fortress was built around 3000 BC, during the Bronze Age, when communities in parts of Europe began to adopt metal and historic stone tools. The structure is not a simple defensive wall, but a thoughtful design that reflects organized architecture on a large scale.The fortifications reportedly stretch about 77 meters and follow a carefully designed geometric layout. Round fortress-like protrusions stood at each corner, allowing anyone defending the enclosure to monitor approaches from multiple directions.There are smaller protected sections within the facade, arranged around a central open space. Defensive ditches added another layer of security, indicating that the purpose of the settlement was to ward off threats rather than simply mark territory. Overall design points to a community capable of coordinating planning, labor organization, and engineering knowledge often associated with later periods. Prehistoric fortified settlements have been documented for decades throughout the Iberian Peninsula, but the Extremadura site stands out for its size and architectural complexity.
The most puzzling discovery was made near the center of the abandoned paddock. Archaeologists have discovered the remains of an adult male who was buried thousands of years after the fortress ceased operations.Examination revealed that the person may have been between 25 and 35 years old at the time of death. Next to him lies a dagger associated with Roman military equipment, placing the tomb firmly in the Roman period, rather than the prehistoric occupation of the site. The difference in time is staggering. By the time the man was laid to rest, the fortress had been abandoned for about two thousand years.
Why were Roman soldiers buried there?
The man’s identity remains uncertain. Although the weapon suggests a connection to the Roman army, it does not answer whether he served as a legionnaire, traveled with an auxiliary unit, or simply carried military equipment.No obvious damage was found on the bones, suggesting a violent death. It is currently thought that illness or natural causes may have ended his life. If so, the abandoned hilltop paddock may simply have provided a convenient burial site during the journey through the region.Roman communities are known to repurpose older monuments for various purposes, including burials. Ancient buildings often remain visible in the landscape, becoming familiar landmarks to later generations, long after their original functions have faded from memory.
Forensic work may reveal more of his story
Experts are continuing to analyze the remains, hoping to learn where the man came from, his health and whether his diet reflected military service or civilian life.Scientific testing could also determine whether he spent his early years in another part of the Roman Empire before arriving in Spain. This evidence may help explain why his final resting place ended up in a fortress built nearly 3,000 years before his life.
The U.S. Army will allow multiple companies to build critical mineral processing plants at military bases across the country as part of the Trump administration’s push for more domestic production.
Increasing U.S. capacity for critical minerals and reducing reliance on imports, especially from China, has been a priority for President Donald Trump during his second term. (AP Photo/Jacqueline Martin (File Photo))
REalloys Inc., Titan Mining Corp., ioneer Ltd. and Energy Exploration Technologies Inc. have reached agreements with the Pentagon to build the plants, according to people familiar with the matter. The people spoke on condition of anonymity ahead of a formal announcement. The new facility will process rare earth minerals, graphite, lithium and boron, they said.
Increasing U.S. critical mineral production capacity and reducing reliance on imports, especially from China, have been top priorities for the United States president donald trump during his second term. Initiatives included government loans and the acquisition of equity interests in producers, but the use of military property represented a first-of-its-kind approach to mineral processing in the United States.
Rare earths, lithium and graphite are critical for a wide range of applications including consumer electronics, automotive and defense technology.
REalloys will build a rare earth separation facility at Toole Army Depot in Utah, and the rare earths produced will be stored on site for military use, people familiar with the matter said.
Titan Mining will build and operate graphite purification facilities at Pine Bluff Arsenal, Arkansas, and Anniston Army Base, Alabama, people familiar with the matter also said. Energy Exploration Technologies and Sydney-based ioneer, the only non-U.S. company among the four participating companies, will develop a lithium plant and a boron plant respectively.
Titan Mining’s shares rose 12% in New York trading, while ioneer’s depositary receipts rose 7.1%. REalloys recouped some of its previous losses.
this PentagonREalloys, Titan and Energy Exploration Technologies (also known as EnergyX) declined to comment, while ioneer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Geopolitical tensions over critical minerals show no signs of easing. Last week, China’s Commerce Ministry imposed export controls on U.S. rare earth companies MP Materials Corp. and USA Rare Earth Inc., while the Group of Seven developed countries set goals to reduce import dependence on China.
U.S. Rare Earths signed an agreement in January to provide $1.6 billion in funding for plans for new mining, processing and magnet manufacturing capabilities. The federal government also unveiled plans in February to build a $12 billion stockpile of critical minerals.
Last week, the Defense Department’s Strategic Capital Office provided a $725 million conditional loan to Energy Fuels Inc. and a $500 million loan to Phoenix Tailings Inc. Days later, Energy Fuels agreed to acquire rare earth magnet supplier Vacuumschmelze GmbH & Co. and its affiliates for $1.9 billion, which will help fund its plants in Germany and Finland as well as a new plant in South Carolina.
Last March, Trump signed an executive order invoking emergency powers to increase critical mineral production capacity, which foreshadowed plans to build mining plants at military bases.
Mines and processing plants are expensive and challenging to build, and are often opposed by people who live near proposed sites. Meanwhile, the Pentagon under Trump has been looking for ways to leverage its properties, including data centers.
REalloys currently produces alloys at a plant in Ohio and works with the Saskatchewan Research Council to produce so-called heavy rare earths such as terbium and dysprosium. Its Utah plant will focus on rare earths, which are in particularly high demand because of their use in heat-resistant magnets for defense and automobiles. The planned facility would not require taxpayer funding, people familiar with the matter said.
The company raised $100 million in a private placement of common stock on Wednesday.
Titan, a company backed by Canadian mining billionaire Richard Walker, owns zinc and graphite projects in New York.
U.S. Supreme Court allows Trump to end protected status for Haitian and Syrian immigrants
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday allowed the Trump administration to strip hundreds of thousands of Haitian and Syrian immigrants of their humanitarian status to protect them from deportation, further advancing the president’s hardline stance on immigration.The Supreme Court’s conservative justices voted 6-3 to overturn a federal judge’s decision that halted the government’s move to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for more than 350,000 Haitians and 6,100 Syrians.Justice Samuel Alito, who authored the ruling, wrote that the court could not review the administration’s decision on TPS, which could lead to legal challenges to strip any country of that status. “The laws governing TPS expressly prohibit such judicial review,” Alito wrote.
Justice Elena Kagan, who joined liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson in the dissent, said the evidence that race played a role in the government’s Haiti decisions was clear. Kagan highlighted several examples of Trump’s previous rhetoric, including his false claims during his 2024 re-election campaign that Haitian immigrants were eating dogs and cats in Ohio and that Haitian immigrants were “like a death wish to our country.”“The content — filthy, diseased and raw — was filled with racial stereotypes and tropes,” Kagan said. “It’s hard to imagine any white community making such statements today.”Alito said in his ruling that none of the remarks cited were “clearly racial” and could be “founded on race-neutral grounds.”
White House adviser Stephen Miller said the U.S. is completely closed to asylum seekers and that Haitian refugees with TPS should leave the country, dismissing concerns about violence in Haiti by comparing its crime rate to U.S. cities. “In fact, there are areas in Haiti that may have higher crime rates, and guess what? There are areas in Chicago that have equally high crime rates,” Miller said.“The doors of the United States are completely closed to asylum seekers,” Miller said, adding that the government has implemented protocols for sending asylum seekers to other countries.The dispute has potentially wide-ranging implications, affecting 1.3 million immigrants from all 17 countries currently designated for TPS. The Trump administration says such protections are always temporary. Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Branch applauded the ruling, saying the Justice Department “successfully defended the position that TPS was always temporary.”Viles Dorsainvil, a Haitian TPS holder and co-founder of the Haiti Support Center in Springfield, Ohio, said the ruling sent thousands of families into an immediate state of fear. “Haiti is not safe, and everyone knows that. The court’s ruling will not change the reality on the ground, nor will it change the contributions we make in the United States,” Dorsevier said.In another 6-3 ruling, the court sided with the government, defending its authority to turn away asylum seekers because officials believe U.S.-Mexico border crossings are overburdened and unable to handle additional claims. The policy, known as “metering,” allows U.S. immigration officials to stop asylum seekers at the border and refuse to process their applications indefinitely.
Candace Owens is questioning Turning Point USA spokesperson Andrew Corvette’s characterization of Charlie Kirk’s alleged final texts, claiming his public statements differed from what he told her privately after Kirk’s death. Owens said Corvette initially admitted he wasn’t sure who Kirk was referring to, but later claimed the message referred to people on the left. Corvette publicly defended his position, and the exchange reignited the debate surrounding Kirk’s final hours.
New problems arise in the incident Charlie KirkThe final hours of the conference came after conservative commentator Candace Owens publicly questioned the claims of Turning Point USA spokesperson Andrew Corvitt. At issue is whether Corvette said something to Owens in the short time after Kirk’s death that he later changed in his public account. The exchange sparked a new round of debate among conservatives, with both sides insisting on their version of events and growing discussion online.
Candace Owens takes issue with Andrew Corvette’s description of Charlie Kirk’s purported final text
The latest controversy began when Corvette shared a post discussing Kirk’s views during the final year of his life. He wrote that the late founder of Turning Point America was increasingly concerned about the rise of Islam in the West and said the issue had become one of Kirk’s greatest concerns.Owens quickly responded, arguing that the public statement was inconsistent with what she said Corvette told her privately in the immediate aftermath of Kirk’s death.“That’s not what you told me. You told me specifically that he texted me the night before saying ‘They’re going to kill me’.”She went on to explain that she had pressed him for more information at the time.“I specifically asked you who he was referring to and you said ‘I’m not sure.'” This was less than 48 hours after his assassination. “Owens then questioned why his explanation seemed to have changed.“Now are you sure he means the left?”Her comments immediately drew attention on social media, with supporters and critics debating the significance of the alleged dialogue. While some supported Owens’ call for consistency, others defended Corvette’s interpretation of Kirk’s public statements.
Debate continues, Andrew Corvert stands his ground
Corvette isn’t backing down from his previous comments. Instead, he continued to respond to users on X who questioned his version of events.According to his public responses, Kirk repeatedly expressed concern that “leftists will try to kill him.” Corvette repeated this statement in response to several users who questioned how he came to this conclusion.But, she said, he had a conversation with her shortly after Kirk’s death in which he said things that contradicted those public statements. Her criticism was not directed at the broader political discussion but at what she saw as actions in the so-called last text message story.During this exchange, neither Owens nor Corvette provided any additional evidence beyond their own claims. This means the debate remains driven by competing personal accounts rather than independently verified information.The controversy has once again thrust the death of Charlie Kirk to the forefront of public discussion, highlighting enduring rifts in conservative media. The dispute over the so-called final text is also far from settled, with both sides standing firm and the story still circulating widely online.
