UK lawmakers are seeking to ban the use of so-called “forever chemicals” in a variety of everyday products.
UK lawmakers are calling for a phased ban on so-called “forever chemicals” in a variety of everyday products, including school uniforms, non-stick cookware and food packaging, amid growing concerns about their long-term effects on health and the environment.
What did MPs propose?
A report by the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee calls on the government to ban the unnecessary use of PFAS chemicals, a class of man-made substances used to make products water-, stain- and heat-resistant.Lawmakers suggested that PFAS should be phased out from 2027 whenever safer alternatives exist, with exemptions only available where deemed necessary or unavoidable.
Why PFAS is under scrutiny
Often referred to as “forever chemicals,” PFAS are used in thousands of consumer and industrial products, from raincoats and school uniforms to firefighting foam and medical equipment.Their durability is also an issue – they don’t break down easily in the environment and can accumulate in water, soil and even the human body over time.Some studies have linked certain PFAS to health risks, including kidney cancer, immune system effects and increased cholesterol levels, although research on many of the chemicals is still ongoing.
“Almost all of us have PFAS in our bodies”
Committee chairman Toby Perkins said evidence presented during the inquiry showed widespread contact had occurred.He said that while the public should not panic, “now is the time to take action” before pollution levels worsen further, the BBC reported.Experts also warn that PFAS are often added to products for convenience, such as making clothes stain-resistant, without consumers realizing it.
Call for stronger supervision and clean-up
The report also recommends:
- A “polluter pays” system where companies fund cleanup costs
- National Restoration Fund for Affected Communities
- Tighter restrictions on the release of PFAS into the environment
- Invest in technology to safely destroy chemicals
Industry and government response
Environmental groups and scientists welcomed the recommendations, calling them a necessary shift toward greater regulation.However, industry representatives believe a blanket ban could have unintended consequences, including rising costs and increased waste.The UK government said it was reviewing the proposals and pointed to its existing PFAS action plan, which focuses on monitoring, tighter controls and reducing exposure through safer alternatives.
