Controversy over cause of death Charlie Kirk Candace Owens has reiterated her controversial stance. Owens said on her podcast that she was “99.9% certain” Taylor Robinson was not the shooter, pointing to a key forensic detail that has now entered public discussion. According to a recent legal filing, bullets found during the autopsy were not a match to the rifle allegedly linked to Robinson.The single claim reignited an already polarizing case. Previously, investigators believed Robinson was the prime suspect, but now Owens is making it sound more complicated. Her comments suggest she not only doubts the official account but outright denies it. This raises more questions about how the investigation was conducted.
Candace Owens challenges official narrative and calls for deeper review
Owens did not back down when speaking about the new developments, insisting the case against Robinson was deeply flawed. She claims to have spoken with sources close to the investigation and claims federal authorities may have fabricated a misleading case.“There’s overwhelming evidence that the FBI used this kid as a scapegoat. Everybody in town, all the local sheriff’s departments, the SWAT teams, they all believed the FBI got involved and started lying… I’m talking to people who have first-hand knowledge and they all believe the FBI set this up… Why wouldn’t I testify for the defense? I want to find the real killer of Charlie. I don’t want to find some random kid that they picked up,” she said.She even went a step further, saying Robinson was almost certainly innocent as the shooter.“I feel exactly the opposite of Charlie Kirk’s wife. I’m almost certain that Taylor Robinson didn’t shoot… I would say I’m 99.9 percent sure that Taylor Robinson didn’t personally shoot Charlie Kirk from the rooftop… I’m going to say 0.1 percent because I don’t know and you should never say 100 percent… I’m following the facts and Taylor Robinson didn’t do that. He was not the lone gunman on the roof, okay?”Owens also questioned other elements of the case, including alleged weapons-related text messages and forensic findings. She argued that inconsistencies continued to arise, urging critics to either focus on the details or remain silent.The case is now at a crossroads as Robinson’s legal team seeks more time to review evidence before a preliminary hearing. Public opinion is rapidly dividing, and Owens’ comments ensure that this conversation is far from over.
